When I first stepped into the IT world in 1999, the term “cybersecurity” wasn’t the buzzword it is today. In fact, most people would have given you a puzzled look if you’d mentioned it in casual conversation. Back then, we were still getting used to the idea of having computers in every office, and the internet was just beginning to transform from a novelty into a necessity.

Image

As someone who has witnessed the evolution of digital security firsthand, I can’t help but reflect on how dramatically things have changed over the past couple of decades. The journey from basic antivirus software to today’s complex security operations centers (SOCs) tells a fascinating story about how our digital world has evolved – and not always in the ways we might have expected.

The early days: when Security was an afterthought

In the early 2000s, cybersecurity was primarily reactive. We installed antivirus software, set up firewalls, and hoped for the best. The threats were simpler then: email viruses, simple malware, and the occasional website defacement. It was a time when many businesses still kept their most important data in physical files, and the idea of a cloud-based infrastructure would have seemed like science fiction.

I remember the first major security incident I dealt with – a virus that spread through email attachments. The solution was straightforward: update the antivirus definitions and teach users not to open suspicious attachments. Compare that to today’s sophisticated ransomware attacks, and it feels like we were living in a different era entirely.

When data became everything!

As we moved through the 2000s and into the 2010s, something fundamental shifted. Organizations began to realize that their digital assets were becoming as valuable as – if not more valuable than – their physical ones. Customer data, intellectual property, and operational systems all moved into the digital realm. This transformation brought with it new challenges and responsibilities for protecting these assets.

The threat landscape evolved alongside this digital transformation. We saw the rise of organized cybercrime, state-sponsored attacks, and sophisticated malware that could lie dormant in systems for months before striking. The security community responded with new tools, frameworks, and methodologies. SIEM systems, threat intelligence platforms, and security automation became part of our daily vocabulary.

Today’s reality: the age of Metrics and Frameworks

Fast forward to today, and cybersecurity has become a board-level concern. While this increased attention is generally positive, it has led to what I consider an over-reliance on metrics and frameworks. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) dominate security discussions, often at the expense of practical security improvements.

Don’t get me wrong – metrics and frameworks serve an important purpose. They help organizations measure their security posture, track improvements, and communicate progress to stakeholders. The problem arises when we become so focused on these numbers that we lose sight of our primary mission: protecting our systems and data from real threats.

I’ve sat in countless meetings where the discussion centers around improving specific metrics to meet compliance requirements or match industry benchmarks. Meanwhile, fundamental security issues – like understaffed security teams or inadequate employee training – receive less attention because they’re harder to quantify in a quarterly report.

The compliance trap

One particularly concerning trend I’ve observed is the growing emphasis on regulatory compliance at the expense of actual security. Whether it’s DORA regulations, cybersecurity frameworks, or any other standard, organizations often fall into the trap of treating compliance as the end goal rather than a baseline for security.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: cybercriminals don’t care about your compliance status. They don’t check whether your KRIs are within acceptable ranges or if you’ve implemented every control in your chosen framework. They look for vulnerabilities – technical or human – and exploit them mercilessly.

A perfectly compliant organization can still fall victim to a cyber attack if they haven’t built a genuine culture of security awareness. I’ve seen this happen: companies with impressive security metrics and full compliance checkmarks brought to their knees by a single phishing email that slipped through their defenses.

What really matters: People and Culture

After more than two decades in this field, I’ve come to believe that we need to refocus on what truly makes organizations secure: people and culture. Here’s what I think we should prioritize:

Security awareness

Instead of treating security training as an annual checkbox exercise, we need to make it an ongoing, engaging process that empowers employees to become the first line of defense. This means moving beyond generic training videos to create real understanding and engagement with security principles.

Adequate resources

Many organizations try to protect billion-dollar operations with security teams that are severely understaffed and under-resourced. No amount of automation or fancy tools can completely make up for not having enough skilled professionals to monitor, respond to, and proactively hunt for threats.

Security culture

Building a true security culture means making security considerations part of every business decision, from software development to vendor selection. It means creating an environment where employees feel comfortable reporting security concerns and where security teams are seen as enablers rather than obstacles.

As we continue to evolve, the importance of cybersecurity will only grow. The challenge for organizations will be finding the right balance between measurable security metrics and practical security improvements. We need both – but we need to ensure that our focus on metrics doesn’t come at the expense of actual security effectiveness.

The next frontier in cybersecurity isn’t just about better tools or more sophisticated metrics. It’s about remembering that behind every security metric, there are real systems, real data, and real people that need protection.

As someone who has watched this field evolve from its early days, I remain optimistic about the future of cybersecurity. But I also believe we need to regularly step back and ask ourselves: Are we measuring security, or are we actually improving it? The answer should guide our path forward.